Custom papers academic service

Only a belief in embodied existence after death is philosophically justifiable discuss essay

Hire Writer It would then follow that the only plausible after-death-existence would be embodied.

Only a belief in embodied existence after death is philosophically justifiable. Discuss Essay

It is the first point made by Descartes and many others which this essay will lean towards as it will be argued that disembodied existence is as philosophically plausible, if not more so than embodied. Many would claim that Christianity can be used to argue both sides of this issue. An example of where it may be used to support embodied life after death is in the resurrection stories.

Since we believe that Jesus died and rose again.

A drop in the sea

Although it is unclear as to whether or not some would have also agreed with a disembodied afterlife before judgment day and resurrection, many devout Christians only accept the embodied resurrection at the end of days.

However, due to the complexity of the bible, it is difficult to completely understand whether or not there is a state between death and resurrection and many may feel the argument is far from philosophically justifiable.

  • Thus, we both want to speak of the subject of sensation on an analogy with physical change and to distinguish the former from the latter;
  • The form such a subject takes on as the result of the change cannot be an incidental form like size or location or temperature;
  • If it relies only on truths anyone can be expected upon sufficient reflection to know about the world, and if it offers to lead to new truths on the basis of such truths, and only on that basis, then it is philosophical discourse;
  • The concepts come to be in us as a result of our engagement with the sensible world.

There has of course also been a long tradition of belief in disembodied afterlife. The Greek philosophy Plato believed we have separate souls which leave our bodies at death in order to join another.

It is important to understand that Plato believed in the soul because he believed innate knowledge must just be memories from previous existences. Furthermore, Plato was part of the chain of thought that says that everything has an opposite but they are always in a cycle, hot becomes cold for cold to then become hot and living things die just for new life to emerge.

Believing in the cycle of opposites makes it clear why Plato would have believed in some kind of disembodied soul. Returning to the question put to Plato mentioned at the start of this argument, we see his response makes his belief in the afterlife clear.

Related Religious Studies & Philosophy documents

Geach, along with many other modern philosophers argue that the idea of a separate body and soul has come from misunderstanding of scriptural language. Geach believed that the only reasonable theory of the soul was the Aristotelian idea that the soul is the form of a living body.

  • The best evidence for the generalisations by which our sciences describe nature is frequency;
  • Only in 1 is the grammatical subject expressive of the subject of the change;
  • Beyond Physics When Aristotle rejected the Platonic Ideas or Forms, accepting some of the arguments against them that Plato himself had devised in the Parmenides, he did not thereby reject the notion that the telos of philosophical enquiry is a wisdom which turns on what man can know of God;
  • Even if we were to claim that a machine could in fact be conscious, the technological prospect of mind uploading raises a second philosophical issue;
  • Two crucial philosophical issues are raised by this prospect;
  • Surely not in principle.

Reincarnation, or rebirth afterlife in a physical form ,are a key feature at the heart of Hindu beliefs. They believe the Atman to be eternal and something which seeks to be united with God.

Once this realisation of unity is reached, the atman no longer needs to continue in the cycle and so is released moksha.

Saint Thomas Aquinas

For the Hindu, physical bodies are nothing more than a container for the atman, the atman which holds the persons nature. This means that after going round the cycle a few times, the atman or soul is released from the container and moves on to disembodied life after death. Hinduism is the oldest spiritual tradition in the world and there is evidence that it flourished long before recorded history in India which means that the idea of a separate body and soul could have been the original belief.

  • We observe, for example, that metal expands when heated;
  • These principles are not themselves the products of deductive proof—which does not of course mean that they are immune to rational analysis and inquiry—and thus they are said to be known by themselves per se, as opposed to per alia.

Descartes is one of the most famous philosophers and dualists and his belief on life after death was that what makes us, us is our ability to think; our consciousness. His conceivability argument leads us to wonder whether or not we need our bodies at all. The argument was laid out with 3 steps, it begins with the premise that a thinking thing can imagine existing without a body.

The result of the argument is that a thinking thing is not identical with its body and so, they must be separate. Many believe this Is a fantastic argument for disembodied life after death as it gets the opposition thinking about not thinking and so leaves them at a blank.

An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

I feel that the strongest argument covered in this essay is that put forward at the start and the end. For many, the fact that we cannot think of our minds not existing is a far stronger argument than that of say, Peter Geach as looking back over past scriptures is just like copying off of someone in a test who has made their answers up, we would just be looking at something which may or may not be true.


While I was slightly swayed by the first argument in favour of the given statement, due to its use of past events and a tradition of belief, however in then end, I have maintained my view that it is just as philosophically feasible to think of a disembodied life after death then an embodied one. How to cite this page Choose cite format: